Vol. 5, No. 2, 173-179, 2006
|
Classification of weed patches in QuickBird images: Verification by ground truth data
Matthias Backes and Jan Jacobi
Abstract
Current methods for mapping weeds in arable land include manual sampling approaches and online
computer-based methods with special sensors. Both methods are expensive, time
consuming and not suitable for constructing regional maps of weed status. This
study investigated the use of a visual interpretation of high-resolution
satellite images from the QuickBird
satellite in order to detect weeds in a field of sugar beets (Beta vulgaris L.) near Bonn in Germany. The
study compared this visual interpretation with the data acquired applying a WeedScanner survey of the same area. This
method allows an exhaustive survey of weeds in the field. The analysis showed
that dense clumps of Canada thistle (Cirsium
arvense L.) were accurately detected in the satellite images, but that
small and sparsely occurring weeds could not be reliably detected. The results
prove the limitations of remote sensing in the context of weed control but they
also show that there is a great potential for early decision making for particular
weed species. |
View Full Text (pdf file, 1.5 MB)
|
|
History
Submitted: 25 May 2004
Revised: 28 June 2006
Accepted: 28 June 2006
Published: 03 July 2006
Citation
Backes M & J Jacobi, 2006.
Classification of weed patches in QuickBird images: Verification by ground truth data.
EARSeL eProceedings, 5(2): 173-179
|
|
ISSN 1729-3782
|